Scenario

Round-trip latencies for chained requests eth_getBlockByNumber(latest, false) and eth_getLogs(hash) with start-to-start throttling of (at least) 1100 ms for every request.

Also, block number consistency with block availability and block age. The block propagation comparison is conservative and latency-agnostic.

Of the possible 31 regions, 8 were selected for data collection: Ireland, Zaragoza, London, Paris, Frankfurt, Zurich, Milan, and Stockholm.

Each location probe breaks its processing loop if / when the endpoint response is too-many-requests, a.k.a. HTTP code 429 etc. Also, codes 401 and 403.

At the time of the report generation: 16 of 16 datasets were available from 8 selected regions x 2 endpoints.

Additional info about RPC Inspector Pro technology is in the FAQ and documentation

Findings

A. base-mainnet.g.Alchemy.com
Base
A. P95 COMPARISON
winner region / method
16
worse region / method
0
additional region / method
0
A. RPC QUALITY
number consistency
100%
block availability
100%
A. RPC RESPONSES
Success
240
Fail
0
429
0
B. mainnet.Base.org
Base
B. P95 COMPARISON
winner region / method
0
worse region / method
16
additional region / method
0
B. RPC QUALITY
number consistency
100%
block availability
100%
B. RPC RESPONSES
Success
240
Fail
0
429
0
BLOCK PROPAGATION
Endpoint Lagging Unique Lowest Arrival Tms Arrival Region Highest Arrival Tms Arrival Region
A. base-mainnet.g.Alchemy.com 0 15 46,867,725 1,780,524,797,676 Frankfurt / AWS 46,867,739 1,780,524,826,310 Frankfurt / AWS
B. mainnet.Base.org 0 14 46,867,725 1,780,524,797,763 Paris / AWS 46,867,739 1,780,524,826,394 London / AWS

No conclusive proof of block lag was found in this dataset / interval.

Summary

Global and continental aggregations by endpoint and method(s) depend on completeness of data in the details.

Details

Latencies exclude one warmup request per endpoint in each region. Additional columns are visible when you scroll to the right.

No Errors In this Dataset