Scenario

Checkpoint propagation and regional arrival lag.

The probe(s) subscribe with Sui SubscribeCheckpoints over gRPC and capture each checkpoint arrival. Datasets from all regions are merged by checkpoint + digest to detect the leader and followers for each checkpoint.

Of the possible 31 regions, 31 were selected for data collection: Oregon, N. California, Mexico, Columbus, OH, N. Virginia, Montreal, São Paulo, Ireland, Zaragoza, London, Paris, Frankfurt, Zurich, Milan, Stockholm, Cape Town, Tel Aviv, Dubai, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, Singapore, Jakarta, Hong Kong, Taipei, Seoul, Osaka, Tokyo, Melbourne, and Sydney.

Each location probe breaks its processing loop if / when the endpoint response is too-many-requests, a.k.a. HTTP code 429 etc. Also, codes 401 and 403.

At the time of the report generation: 30 of 31 datasets were available from 31 selected regions x 1 endpoint.

One dataset was not available at the time of the report generation: aws-me-central-1.

Additional info about RPC Inspector Pro technology is in the FAQ and documentation

CHECKPOINT LEADERSHIP
sui.01.ro
leading checkpoints
135
behind checkpoint per region
96.7%
avg lag (ms)
93.1
COMPLETENESS
unique checkpoints
136
observed in all probes
135
CHECKPOINT NUMBER GAPS
count of unique gaps
0
count of probes w gaps
0
RPC RESPONSES
Success
4069
Fail
0
429
0

Summary by Dataset

Summary by Checkpoint

Includes only "complete" checkpoints (checkpoints seen by every probe). The p95 of the values in the column "p95" is: 268 ms.

Details

Per checkpoint, leading endpoint-region vs. every other arrival for the same checkpoint, incl. checkpoints not seen by every probe. Regional "wall clocks" are treated as globally synchronized.

No Errors In this Dataset