Scenario

Round-trip latencies for chained requests eth_getBlockByNumber(latest, false) and eth_getLogs(hash) with start-to-start throttling of (at least) 1100 ms for every request.

Also, block number consistency with block availability and block age. The block propagation comparison is conservative and latency-agnostic.

Of the possible 31 regions, 31 were selected for data collection: Oregon, N. California, Mexico, Columbus, OH, N. Virginia, Montreal, São Paulo, Ireland, Zaragoza, London, Paris, Frankfurt, Zurich, Milan, Stockholm, Cape Town, Tel Aviv, Dubai, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, Singapore, Jakarta, Hong Kong, Taipei, Seoul, Osaka, Tokyo, Melbourne, and Sydney.

Each location probe breaks its processing loop if / when the endpoint response is too-many-requests, a.k.a. HTTP code 429 etc. Also, codes 401 and 403.

At the time of the report generation: 62 of 62 datasets were available from 31 selected regions x 2 endpoints.

GLOBAL LATENCY p95 ms
A. 1rpc.io
eth_getBlockByNumber_latest_false
387.6
eth_getLogs_hash
629.9
Celo Mainnet successes
871
A. P95 COMPARISON
winner region / method
0
worse region / method
60
additional region / method
0
A. RPC QUALITY
number consistency
95.8%
block availability
99.3%
A. RPC RESPONSES
Success
871
Fail
21
429
0
GLOBAL LATENCY p95 ms
B. rpc.Ankr.com
eth_getBlockByNumber_latest_false
169.3
eth_getLogs_hash
212.3
Celo Mainnet successes
930
B. P95 COMPARISON
winner region / method
60
worse region / method
0
additional region / method
2
B. RPC QUALITY
number consistency
100%
block availability
100%
B. RPC RESPONSES
Success
930
Fail
0
429
0
BLOCK PROPAGATION
Endpoint Lagging Unique Lowest Arrival Tms Arrival Region Highest Arrival Tms Arrival Region
A. 1rpc.io 384 8 66,433,587 1,778,334,374,126 Hyderabad / AWS 66,433,641 1,778,334,399,828 Tel Aviv / AWS
B. rpc.Ankr.com 0 19 66,433,615 1,778,334,373,896 Frankfurt / AWS 66,433,644 1,778,334,402,533 Singapore / AWS

We detected 384 responses whose sendTms, arrivalTms and number were such that we can state the endpoint was lagging in the respective region.

E.g. on arrivalTms=1,778,334,373,927 in Bangkok / AWS, we received number 66,433,615 from B. rpc.Ankr.com. Afterwards, on sendTms=1,778,334,376,094 we dispatched a request to A. 1rpc.io, which returned lower number 66,433,614 at arrivalTms=1,778,334,376,302. Therefore, A. 1rpc.io was lagging because it was returning lower number 66,433,614 well after B. rpc.Ankr.com advanced to 66,433,615.

Summary

Global and continental aggregations by endpoint and method(s) depend on completeness of data in the details.

Details

Latencies exclude one warmup request per endpoint in each region. Additional columns are visible when you scroll to the right. 1 dataset (endpoint-region) is not in the details because its probe received rate limits or other failures during connection setup and warmup.

Errors

Info about errors incl. 429. Up to 4 retained error responses per endpoint, per region. Scenario-derived availability notes may also appear.