thirdweb vs. Tenderly on Optimism Mainnet

GLOBAL NODE COMPARISON

Independent and transparent RPC performance comparison results

Data captured on (Fri, 19 Jan 2024 17:53:54 GMT UTC)

Better Overall Latency: A. thirdweb

A. thirdweb was faster from 4 continents:

  • S.America
  • ME & Africa
  • Asia
  • Australia

B. Tenderly was faster from 2 continents:

  • N.America
  • Europe

A. thirdweb was faster from 13 regions:

  • São Paulo
  • Cape Town
  • Bahrain
  • Mumbai
  • Hyderabad
  • Singapore
  • Jakarta
  • Hong Kong
  • Seoul
  • Osaka
  • Tokyo
  • Melbourne
  • Sydney

B. Tenderly was faster from 14 regions:

  • N. California
  • Oregon
  • N. Virginia
  • Ohio
  • Montreal
  • Ireland
  • London
  • Spain
  • Paris
  • Frankfurt
  • Stockholm
  • Zurich
  • Milan
  • UAE

Global: Summary

Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) ChainID Failed 429 Success Duration (ms)
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 78.76 10 0 0 810 63,795
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 89.54 10 0 0 810 72,524

Results represent a comparison at a point in time using eth_blockNumber RPC method and WITH throttling — each regional probe sent its requests synchronously, after it received the previous response but not sooner than 1 second since the previous dispatch.

You can share a page link for these results. Note that the providers make frequent changes to their infrastructure. Therefore, we recommend additional similar comparisons which can be performed using our public Performance Inspector app for blockchain nodes .

N.America: Summary

Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) ChainID Failed 429 Success Duration (ms)
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 48.91 10 0 0 150 7,337
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 20.20 10 0 0 150 3,030

N.America: Details

AWS Region Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) Failed 429 1st Best Worst Success Duration (ms) IP ChainID
Montreal
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 66.47 0 0 37 35/no.24 138/no.27 30 1,994 104.18.5.57 10
Montreal
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 22.80 0 0 24 20/no.2 29/no.15 30 684 35.227.193.242 10
N. Virginia
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 36.07 0 0 22 17/no.26 79/no.19 30 1,082 104.18.5.57 10
N. Virginia
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 8.80 0 0 8 7/no.5 13/no.29 30 264 35.227.193.242 10
Ohio
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 52.80 0 0 37 28/no.14 111/no.15 30 1,584 104.18.4.57 10
Ohio
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 16.53 0 0 16 15/no.9 30/no.25 30 496 35.227.193.242 10
N. California
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 49.33 0 0 18 18/no.1 169/no.29 30 1,480 104.18.5.57 10
N. California
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 35.00 0 0 36 29/no.3 37/no.5 30 1,050 35.227.193.242 10
Oregon
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 39.90 0 0 32 22/no.2 63/no.15 30 1,197 104.18.4.57 10
Oregon
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 17.87 0 0 18 16/no.10 23/no.4 30 536 35.227.193.242 10

S.America: Summary

AWS Region Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) Failed 429 1st Best Worst Success Duration (ms) IP ChainID
São Paulo
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 96.50 0 0 27 19/no.26 430/no.3 30 2,895 104.18.4.57 10
São Paulo
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 121.53 0 0 121 120/no.4 126/no.16 30 3,646 35.227.193.242 10

Europe: Summary

Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) ChainID Failed 429 Success Duration (ms)
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 52.53 10 0 0 240 12,607
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 21.18 10 0 0 240 5,082

Europe: Details

AWS Region Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) Failed 429 1st Best Worst Success Duration (ms) IP ChainID
Frankfurt
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 30.20 0 0 24 16/no.23 58/no.16 30 906 104.18.4.57 10
Frankfurt
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 5.47 0 0 6 4/no.2 8/no.6 30 164 35.227.193.242 10
Zurich
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 56.10 0 0 56 26/no.10 119/no.5 30 1,683 104.18.5.57 10
Zurich
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 11.93 0 0 11 11/no.1 19/no.21 30 358 35.227.193.242 10
Stockholm
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 69.03 0 0 30 30/no.1 172/no.7 30 2,071 104.18.5.57 10
Stockholm
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 32.00 0 0 33 31/no.4 35/no.6 30 960 35.227.193.242 10
Milan
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 54.37 0 0 25 23/no.15 145/no.14 30 1,631 104.18.5.57 10
Milan
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 16.47 0 0 28 14/no.2 28/no.1 30 494 35.227.193.242 10
Spain
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 80.57 0 0 74 38/no.10 136/no.3 30 2,417 104.18.4.57 10
Spain
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 42.43 0 0 41 39/no.6 60/no.13 30 1,273 35.227.193.242 10
Ireland
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 46.40 0 0 30 16/no.8 85/no.13 30 1,392 104.18.5.57 10
Ireland
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 25.30 0 0 25 24/no.5 31/no.4 30 759 35.227.193.242 10
London
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 44.90 0 0 21 19/no.12 100/no.25 30 1,347 104.18.5.57 10
London
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 19.73 0 0 19 18/no.3 26/no.17 30 592 35.227.193.242 10
Paris
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 38.67 0 0 54 20/no.22 68/no.3 30 1,160 104.18.5.57 10
Paris
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 16.07 0 0 14 14/no.1 33/no.12 30 482 35.227.193.242 10

ME & Africa: Summary

Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) ChainID Failed 429 Success Duration (ms)
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 129.90 10 0 0 90 11,691
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 147.41 10 0 0 90 13,267

ME & Africa: Details

AWS Region Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) Failed 429 1st Best Worst Success Duration (ms) IP ChainID
Cape Town
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 120.10 0 0 20 17/no.8 389/no.21 30 3,603 104.18.4.57 10
Cape Town
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 194.13 0 0 192 192/no.1 201/no.10 30 5,824 35.227.193.242 10
UAE
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 151.47 0 0 143 122/no.25 191/no.7 30 4,544 104.18.4.57 10
UAE
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 121.23 0 0 123 118/no.4 128/no.21 30 3,637 35.227.193.242 10
Bahrain
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 118.13 0 0 103 91/no.28 155/no.25 30 3,544 104.18.5.57 10
Bahrain
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 126.87 0 0 127 124/no.3 133/no.14 30 3,806 35.227.193.242 10

Asia: Summary

Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) ChainID Failed 429 Success Duration (ms)
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 96.34 10 0 0 240 23,122
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 154.53 10 0 0 240 37,088

Asia: Details

AWS Region Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) Failed 429 1st Best Worst Success Duration (ms) IP ChainID
Hong Kong
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 99.40 0 0 23 18/no.24 203/no.23 30 2,982 104.18.5.57 10
Hong Kong
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 138.93 0 0 139 136/no.17 140/no.3 30 4,168 35.227.193.242 10
Tokyo
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 73.53 0 0 26 20/no.14 152/no.7 30 2,206 104.18.4.57 10
Tokyo
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 94.30 0 0 94 93/no.21 97/no.28 30 2,829 35.227.193.242 10
Seoul
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 79.47 0 0 23 15/no.8 155/no.3 30 2,384 104.18.5.57 10
Seoul
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 122.20 0 0 123 120/no.11 126/no.25 30 3,666 35.227.193.242 10
Osaka
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 74.43 0 0 23 15/no.18 155/no.25 30 2,233 104.18.4.57 10
Osaka
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 104.17 0 0 103 102/no.5 108/no.12 30 3,125 35.227.193.242 10
Mumbai
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 105.70 0 0 30 19/no.17 293/no.6 30 3,171 104.18.5.57 10
Mumbai
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 225.40 0 0 226 220/no.25 230/no.23 30 6,762 35.227.193.242 10
Hyderabad
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 126.17 0 0 41 38/no.16 300/no.30 30 3,785 104.18.4.57 10
Hyderabad
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 207.60 0 0 203 203/no.1 217/no.16 30 6,228 35.227.193.242 10
Singapore
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 106.87 0 0 26 18/no.8 217/no.9 30 3,206 104.18.5.57 10
Singapore
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 164.67 0 0 165 164/no.3 166/no.4 30 4,940 35.227.193.242 10
Jakarta
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 105.17 0 0 27 14/no.16 265/no.29 30 3,155 104.18.4.57 10
Jakarta
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 179.00 0 0 180 177/no.20 181/no.13 30 5,370 35.227.193.242 10

Australia: Summary

Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) ChainID Failed 429 Success Duration (ms)
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 102.38 10 0 0 60 6,143
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 173.52 10 0 0 60 10,411

Australia: Details

AWS Region Provider Endpoint Avg (ms) Failed 429 1st Best Worst Success Duration (ms) IP ChainID
Sydney
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 98.03 0 0 16 13/no.20 198/no.15 30 2,941 104.18.5.57 10
Sydney
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 169.03 0 0 169 166/no.27 173/no.12 30 5,071 35.227.193.242 10
Melbourne
A. thirdweb
thirdweb.com 106.73 0 0 15 14/no.16 260/no.17 30 3,202 104.18.4.57 10
Melbourne
B. Tenderly
tenderly.co 178.00 0 0 177 175/no.9 181/no.6 30 5,340 35.227.193.242 10